nerdy

Part 1 of a series about productivity in life and as a department chair… without going too far off the edge! There’s plenty of advice out there on creating the basic to-do list. There are lots of different programs and apps, the bullet journal concept, as well as many different concepts one can buy and/or…

Read More Supercharging the to-do-list

It feels like it’s a one-sided relationship between you two… I’m hoping that you both will work with me here. Parallels really wanted me to install Windows 11. And if you look at the Parallels website, it says that I can. As I mention elsewhere on this site, I have a mid-2015 MacBook Pro. But…

Read More Dear Microsoft and Parallels,

Or what happened when I spent an afternoon reviewing all of the classes in my department…. The perfect pre-Christmas nerdy project: if I could reorganize all of our classes with different numbers, how would I do it? And why do it in the first place? The answer to the latter question actually comes from something…

Read More Making course numbers mean something

To members of administration and others: there are actually interesting academic discussions that take place on Facebook. A few days ago, I learned about one of them: tapered scoring in debate tournaments — particularly British Parliamentary Debate tournaments. In a nutshell, here’s the basic argument: all rounds don’t count equally when it comes to deciding…

Read More So I learned something (academically) new on Facebook: Tapered Scoring

In other words, the epistemology of “the top competitors at a given tournament.” When we tiebreak a final, we’re asking how to determine the top 6 (or so) speakers at a particular speech tournament, or ways of distinguishing between several teams that may have the same debate record. But how do we know who those…

Read More Another nerdy tab post: What’s the point of speaker points in forensics?

So the following actually happened at a Vocal Viking tournament. One debater apparently couldn’t debate during round 3[1]Why? I still don’t know., so the debater’s partner debated “maverick” (in other words, by themself). Speechwire requires that each speaker receives at least 1 speaker point (that way, the program knows you didn’t accidentally forget to enter…

Read More Nerdy tab post: when is a team’s seeding not right?